The September 11 2001 attacks were a series of coordinated suicide attacks by Islam upon the West. On that morning, 19 Muslims hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners. The hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and 3,000 others working in the buildings. Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying nearby buildings and damaging others. The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon. The fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Pennsylvania after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington, D.C.
Geert Wilders points out Koran is the Islamic Mein Kampf that incites Muslims to resort to violence. Koran calls for hatred, misogyny, polygyny, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. Koran calls for Muslims to kill infidels, to terrorize infidels, and to fulfil their duty to wage war, the violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every motherfucker Muslim ape, Islam is to rule the world by the sword. Koran is clearly antisemitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.
Basil Venitis notes the idea of a separation of Mosque and State is unheard of in Islam. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Sharia Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other freakish things, the dehumanization of women, the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers, and the killing of homosexuals, apostates, and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some extremist form of it. If jihadists were actually perverting a great religion, Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to Koran: When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them. Ch. 47:4
Wilders asserts Mohammed was a charlatan, a bipolar maniac, a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and a misogynist. Islamic tradition tells us how Mohammed had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Here is an emoticon of Mohammed with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):-{>
Islam is not a religion, but a satanic terrorist cacoculture. Sure, it has a grudge-collecting god, and an afterlife with 72 virgins for each martyr. But in its essence, Islam is a totalitarian ideology and sadomasochism. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means submission. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is the incivility of terrorist jihad and sharia.
Islamic totalitarianism is potentially far more dangerous than either the Nazi or Communist variety, since the latter, despite their exterminating follies, presupposed their own preservation. For the Nazi, the inferior race does not deserve to exist; for the Stalinist, a capitalist does not merit to continue living; for the Islamist, it is the world itself that does not deserve to exist. When someone tells you he is going to kill you, believe him.
Islam and Nazism share fundamental ideological tenets and premises. It is no coincidence that Islam is compatible with Nazism. Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem agreed wholeheartedly on that point. That agreement was not confined exclusively to their mutual hatred of Jews. The Grand Mufti envied Hitler for the whole of his ideology and for having brought it to fruition.
We detest Islam because it is one of the most degrading evil collectivist creeds in existence. We detest it for all the crimes it has committed throughout history, more than the atrocities committed by any religious creed. We understand the sensitivities and emotions of all their victims. So, if that is bigotry, we will make the most of it. For Islam is distinct from all other creeds for the reason that it is, from top to bottom, virulently antilife.
Venitis asserts that Fourth Reich(EU) should understand and lock horns with an ideology, masquerading as a religion, and rein in Muslims who seek to turn Europe into Eurabia, a theocratic state run by Mullahs and those who wield the sword of Islam. Europe is under threat because European tolerance and European generosity towards those of other countries and cultures are being used by intolerant people, in order to promote intolerance. This is a weakness which can be exploited by them for only so long.
Violence and denial of human rights prevail in Islam. Practices such as stoning of adulterous women, beheadings, execution of apostates, honor killings, hanging of homosexuals, forced child marriages, female circumcision and other odious practices prevail to this day. There is a disgusting hypocritical political correctness relating to Islam that has enveloped Europe. Islam is the Trojan horse in Europe, and if we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia will just be a matter of time.
Venitis notes that diapered Rubenesques, the Islamic zombies, show the misogyny of Islam. Europeans cannot tolerate the burqa, an outer garment covering a woman from head to toe with just a mesh screen to look through , and the niqab, similar to a burqa but with a slit for the eyes instead of mesh, as oppressive to women. The burqa and niqab confiscate a woman's existence, and they are a sign of enslavement and debasement. Those who wear them are victims, zombified by Islamofascists. EU favors banning these coffins for women's basic liberties. The burqa and niqab are proof of the presence of Muslim fundamentalists on Fourth Reich soil and of the politicization of Islam.
Ninja, a woman wearing a burqa or a niqab, is in a state of unbearable isolation, exclusion, and humiliation. Her very existence is denied. The sight of these zombies is intolerable when it comes to us from terrorist Islam. It is totally unacceptable on the soil of Fourth Reich. Zombie dressing is a question of freedom and of women's dignity. The number of ninjas is growing exponentially. Even if ninjas are not jihadists, they hate the West, they spit on the kuffars, the infidels, but they take advantage of all the Fourth Reich social services instead of settling in a Muslim land as dictated by their doctrine. Their duplicity bewilders Europeans.
Venitis asserts that veil and headscarf are not welcome in Fourth Reich(EU), because they are symbols of women's subservience, repression, incivility, and an increasingly divided Fourth Reich. Veil and headscarf make women invisible, transfoms women to zombies, invalidate women's participatory rights, flag women as evil temptresses, oppress women with barbarity, are brands of misogynist Islam, are mobile prisons, and are a security threat.
Kemal and Stalin are the only modern rulers who have subjugated militant political Islam, unveiled women, and controlled the mullahs. But their ferocity would be impossible now. If there is a middle way between such repression and the return of Turkey to its Muslim past, nobody has yet found it. If they do, it may be incompatible with the 21st-century belief in the goodness of democracy and the sanctity of human rights.
Female suicide bombers usually are black widows, Islamist females whose husbands or sons have been killed by infidel forces. Civil Society now fears a tide of black widows. The female militants have been involved in many attacks in recent years, including the 2002 siege of a Moscow theater, a February 2004 bombing in the Moscow metro which killed 39 people, and a March 2010 bombing in Moscow metro that killed 40 people. Many of the women are recruited against their will. Only one in 10 black widows acts out of conviction. The others are forced into the role. Islamist women have no right to their own opinion and can not refuse to obey orders. The patriarchal society treats them merely as a renewable resource.
Mutaween are religious-policing organizations with government recognition and support who enforce the Sharia Law. Mutaween consists of myriad officers in addition to myriad volunteers. They have the power to arrest unrelated males and females caught socializing, anyone engaged in homosexual behavior or prostitution, to enforce Islamic dress-codes, and store closures during the prayer time. They enforce Muslim dietary laws, prohibit the consumption or sale of alcoholic beverages and pork, and seize banned consumer products and media regarded as un-Islamic, such as CDs/DVDs of various Western musical groups, television shows and film. Additionally, they actively prevent the practice or proselytizing of other religions.
Mutaween use flogging to punish violators, ban Valentines Day gifts, arrest priests for saying Mass, and are staffed by ex-convicts whose only job qualification was that they had memorized Koran in order to reduce their sentences. They prevent women from escaping burning buildings, if the women do not wear burqas, and not accompanied by a male guardian; many women died and were injured as a result. Some women who converted to Christianity were burned to death after having their tongues cut out.
Venitis asserts that blasphemy violates no one's rights. To cave in to intimidation and not publish anything religulous freaks feel is offensive is to surrender the crucial principle of free speech. This clash is about respecting man's right to express his views, however unpopular, in the face of religious attempts to subordinate that right to mystical dogmas. Instead of appeasing the mobs who call for executing anyone offending their faith, the West must support those who share its political ideal of free speech.
Blasphemy laws are both silly and dangerous. It is silly because medieval religious laws have no place in a modern secular republic, where the criminal law should protect people and not ideas. And it is dangerous because it incentivises religious outrage, and because Islamic States are already using the wording of blasphemy laws to promote new blasphemy laws at UN level. Blasphemy laws are unjust, because they silence people in order to protect ideas. In a civilised society, people have a right to express and to hear ideas about religion even if other people find those ideas to be outrageous.
Venitis muses the stupidity of Muslims is out of this world. There is a myth circulated in Muslim communities around the world that while on the lunar surface, Neil Armstrong heard a strange noise. Subsequently, back on Earth, upon hearing the Islamic call to prayer, Armstrong recognized it as the sound he had heard on the moon and converted immediately! Our members will no doubt note the moon has no atmosphere, so no sound could exist there. That must explain how Armstrong could have missed the call of the muezzin on the moon! Islam is a voluntary mental illness.
Planetarch Obama claims that Muslims feel stupid because of the decline of Arabic science. But Venitis asserts the Arabic science never declined, because it never really existed! Science and mathematics were carried out by a small number of extraordinary individuals whose activities and outlooks were never fully assimilated to the mainstream Islamic culture. As these individuals disappeared or their patronage dried up, their work dissipated. Since there was no established tradition, we have no need for an explanation of its decline by appeal to general causes.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference(OIC) has initiated an international movement to have the United Nations recognize the defamation of religion, which is designed to protect some religions from criticism, and protect their founders from criticism and insult. For the first time, it would be impossible for people to take a properly critical view of a religion like Islam. Muslim scholars are no longer encouraged to analyze the tenets of Islam and how they're being applied in cultures and societies.
The infamous Human Rights Council has repeatedly adopted resolutions recognizing and promoting bans on the defamation of religions. The proponents of these resolutions seek to ban all criticism of religion, regardless of context or setting. According to OIC, the major proponent of such resolutions, criticism of Islam by itself is an incitement to violence and discrimination and therefore must be banned as Islamophobic. According to the OIC's definition, any speech, book, film, or other form of expression that depicts Islam, Mohammed, or Muslims in an unflattering light constitutes defamation. The defamation of religions resolution is a direct assault on the fundamental rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression.
Basil Venitis asserts Planetarch Hussein Obama's endorsement of the Ground Zero Mosque and terrorist center is disgusting. The fact that someone has the right to do something doesn't necessarily make it the right thing to do. This is not an issue of law, whether religious freedom or local zoning. This is a basic issue of respect for a tragic moment in history. Obama has lost touch with his fellow citizens and does not understand the values and sentiments of the American people, especially while they are still at war around the world with terrorist Islam. Probably Obama is a secret Muslim, because his father was a Muslim, he attended a Muslim school, and he never rejected Islam.
Disguised as religion, Islam has penetrated democracies with the aim of replacing civility and liberty with the barbarism of 7th century Islamic theocracy and Sharia law. Islam's multi-pronged attack aims to destroy all that liberty offers. America, with a long tradition of protecting religious freedom, still clings to the hands off practice of leaving alone any doctrine or practice billed as religion. A thorny problem is in deciding what constitutes a religion and who is to make that call. We must keep in mind that to be a loyal and faithful Muslim, a Muslim must adhere to and perform many obligatory acts, as specified in the Quran by Allah and the Hadith/Sunna, during his entire life.
The mosque serves as a house where Muslim devotees gather together for salat (prayer) and worshiping Allah and his messenger, the prophet Muhammad. Aside from worshiping Allah, a mosque is used for a variety of reasons. These meeting places are perfect warehouses of not only indoctrination, but future terrorists, who are made to read and understand the principles of Jihad, martyrdom and Dar ul Harb (land of war, any place not Islamacized.) Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of intolerance is coming straight from Saudi Arabia, the #2 terrorist nation on Earth after Turkey.
These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabsim. If you have to ask where the Saudi's are getting their money, you are not paying attention...it's coming from you. Not to mention, Planetarch Husein Obama is doing everything he can to accommodate the Cordoba Initiative project at taxpayers' expense. Those useful idiot non-Muslims who support the building of the mosque near the 9/11 site or anywhere else by invoking the ideal of religious freedom, are empowering a creed that is devoted to stamping out freedom of religion or any other form of freedom.
In this relentless campaign, Muslims have a vast cadre of experts, talking heads, and for-purchase politicians who keep endlessly broadcasting the false mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This latter bunch is criminally complicit in making the populace complacent and furthering the work of terrorist Islam.
When mosques are built, imams, mullahs or mosque elders tend to be sent to the West with one clear mission: Make Islamic religion, laws, and life supreme within the West, using any and all tactics necessary. Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing to force the genteel Westerners to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities. Of course, not all Westerners will move or can afford to do so. And to take control of a town, Muslims will not need to evict everyone. They probably need about 25% in order to make life very unpleasant for those who do not go along with their demands.
They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Sharia law. Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal Sharia, and there's nothing the government can or will want to do about it. Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah. Already in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability. Proposals for Sharia are being taken seriously by many Western countries.
Incivility of Sharia:
* Commands that drinkers and gamblers should be whipped;
* Allows husbands to hit their wives;
* Allows an injured plaintiff to exact legal revenge – literally an eye for an eye;
* Commands that a thief must have a hand cut off;
* Commands that homosexuals must be executed;
* Orders unmarried fornicators to be whipped and adulterers to be stoned to death;
* Orders death for both Muslim and non-Muslim critics of Mohammad, the Koran, and Sharia;
* Orders apostates to be killed;
* Commands offensive, aggressive and unjust Jihad.
No comments:
Post a Comment